[Pgsql-ayuda] Robustez de PostgreSQL

[Alvaro Herrera]

Ya que alguien preguntaba por la robustez, he aqui un testimonio
interesante al respecto ...


----- Forwarded message from Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> -----

Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse? 
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 07:57:14 -0000
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: <ntufar@pisem.net>, <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicolai Tufar [mailto:ntufar@pisem.net] 
> Sent: 05 February 2004 00:01
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse? 
> 
> Totally agree. Robustness and rock-solidness are the only 
> things missing for PostgreSQL to become the killer of certain 
> commercial enterprise databases out there.

Well I've only been using PostgreSQL since 1997 and the *only* release I
ever had problems with was 6.3.2. We also use(d) Informix SE, DB2,
Unidata and SQL Server and only Informix and Unidata come close to the
robustness of PostgreSQL - and they're not the ones we need to worry
about.

Now I'm not saying we shouldn't be continually looking to improve
things, but I don't think this is quite the problem you imply.

Regards, Dave.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values
or religion but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence.
Westerners often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do."
(Samuel P. Huntington)